Main Argument in Re-Introducing People Without History
Question: HI 260; Select one of the following readings on African historiography and make an appraisal of its main arguments in one page. 1. E.S. Atieno Odhiambo, “Re-introducing the people without History” 2. B. Swai, “The Balance-sheet Africanist Historiography”
I am going to use reading no 1. By E.S. Atieno Odhiambo,
“Re-introducing people without History”
History views as the interpretation of the past in which serious efforts
has been made to filter out what happened in the past. (Arthur Marwick) (1992 –
page 3). European colonization subjects of African kingdoms and the stateless
communities were doubted as “people without history”. They propose that, the
history of Africa is began after interaction between Africans and Europeans
(colonialism). European authorship from Hegel down to H.R Roper asserted that
Africa constituted a blank darkness and “darkness was no suitable subject for
History” (Trevor – Roper 1966;9).
Colonial historiography presented European as the main actors on any
significant transformation of the Africa continent since its discovery. Africa
nationalist seem colonial historiography as bastard historiography due to the
argument that Africans had their own history even before the coming of the
Europeans.
From the beginning of the 1970’s African history branched into various
specialization such like the nature of domestic slavery in Africa before and
after the Atlantic phase, the impact of the Atlantic slave trade on African
economies demographies and development.
Author Helge Kjeshus (1976) sketched how pre-colonial societies
controlled their environment and were victors in the ecological struggles to
the end of nineteeth century. This inturpted by violent of Germans, were this
period the historiography has become more complex as both archival and oral
histories.
Oral interviews become the accepted field work methodology for colonial
history as well especially since the ordinary Africans were hardly especially
since the ordinary Africans were hardly represented in the official archival
record as makers of their own history. This recovery of the histories of
African resistance, peasants, migrant labor, squatters, regional trade
religious history, agrarian struggles, woman histories, intellectual history
and issues of moral equity were all achieved by undergraduate students and by
foreign and local historians over two decades.
Thomas Hodgkins nationalism in tropical Africa (1956), a populist text
which sought to equate nationalism with any protest phenomenon generally. With
the attainment of political independence as nationalist historiography emerged
to study the origin and course of African nationalism through the lenses of
modernization theory. This help in emergence of new elites who facilitated in
writing of the history of the new state as the history of “African voice.”
Beyond the historians guild the twentienth century has witnessed the
production of popular historical literature in Africa, produced locally often
in nonwestern languages by individuals and collectivities believing in their
past, giving themselves their own history which tell those pasts and which have
meaning authority and significance for the local population hence African
nationalist concluded that Africans had their own history even before the
coming of colonialism.
Written by;
Kitalula Abubakari
REFERENCE
Afigbo, A.E. 1993. Colonial
Historiography. In T. Falola (ed) African
Historiography, Harlow; Longman