Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Curriculum Designs
Question: With examples analyse the advantages and weakness of each of curriculum design (a) Subject centered curriculum design (b) Learner centered curriculum design (c) problem centered curriculum design.
Answer
Curriculum
is a standards-based sequence of planned experiences where students practice
and achieve proficiency in content and applied learning skills. Curriculum is
the central guide for all educators as to what is essential for teaching and
learning, so that every student has access to rigorous academic experiences.
Subject-centered
curriculum design revolves around a particular subject matter or discipline.
For example, a subject-centered curriculum may focus on math or biology. This
type of curriculum design tends to focus on the subject rather than the
individual.
Jackson,
Stratford, Krajcik, & Soloway, 2000; Quintana et al., 2000 further
explained that learner-centered design "considers learning while doing; it
supports learners in the ways of using the software and throughout the use of
it. It also indicates how and why to do the learning tasks. Moreover, these
authors have defined learner-centered design as “the new challenge for
human-computer interaction, with the goal of providing support for both
learning a task and doing it.”
Problem
centered curriculum design a curriculum design that also uses a student
approach but that instructs students to look at a problem or situation and
figure out a way to solve it. Teachers expect students to use their real-life
experiences to determine an answer.
Subject centered curriculum design have the following advantages:
Almost
all textbooks and support materials present on the educational market are
organized on subject-by-subject format. Writers write their lessons based on
the relevant subject. When they write books, they follow the guidelines in the
syllabus.
Another
advantage of Subject centered curriculum is Curriculum planning is easier and
simpler in the subject centered curriculum design. Imagine the period of
planning, developing and implementing the curriculum. Also imagine what goes in
your first staff meeting when every teacher is to be allocated his/her teaching
load for the year and how this should be plotted on the daily school
time-table. It is simply and easily achieved at a short time.
Also, Subject centered curriculum design have the following disadvantages:
Subject-centered
curriculum prevents students from understanding the wider context of what
they’re learning. In the traditional method of learning, students learn math in
one period, reading in another, science in another and social studies in yet
another, separate class. Every subject is taught as though it exists in and of
itself without regard for how one subject impacts another subject. Teachers
provide math worksheets, which the students work to complete. Math problems are
devoid of real-world applications. The same goes for other subjects studied.
Students may learn the history of Tanzania but not how history both past and
current impacts this segment of the Tanzanians in relation to their culture, African
culture and the world at large.
Passive
Learning, in the traditional or subject-centered curriculum, students are
discouraged from entertaining a different point of view than what textbook or
teacher presents. The subject matter has already been chosen by experts in the
different subjects, by school boards and by teachers and deemed of value for
students to learn. The subject matter is of critical importance, while students
become little more than receptacles to be filled, rather than thinking,
rational individuals who need to be part of the learning process. The
subject-centered curriculum fosters not excitement about learning and
knowledge, but passivity.
On the other hand, Learner centered curriculum design have the following advantages:
Improves
participation. The first step towards the success of any Learning program is
participation. A learner centered approach addresses all the essential needs of
learners, ensuring learners get a personalized and convenient learning
experience. For example, if a certain learner group prefers games and
exercises, the courses should be made more interactive. Similarly, if learners
are more likely to access the course content on tablets or mobiles, the courses
should be designed to support this need. Due to the minute attention paid to
learner’s needs, learner centered courses ensure greater participation in
learning.
Transitions
students from passive to active learners. Empowered students can explore what
genuinely interests them and what they are passionate about. They can take
ownership of their work and their ideas. It encourages creativity, originality,
and responsibility in what they are taking away from their learning experience.
The following are disadvantages of Learner centered curriculum design:
An
approach to learning with not as much structure or discipline as a traditional
method, causing students to feel overwhelmed and maybe not pull as much from
learning as they normally would.
Another
disadvantage to learner-centered instruction would be too much independence.
The student is free to do all the work. If the teacher is not careful, mistakes
made can be unseen.
In
either case, the following are advantages of problem centered curriculum
design:
Development
of Long-Term Knowledge Retention, students who participate in problem-based
learning activities can improve their abilities to retain and recall
information, according to a literature review of studies about the pedagogy.
The literature review states “elaboration of knowledge at the time of learning”
-- by sharing facts and ideas through discussion and answering questions --
“enhances subsequent retrieval.” This form of elaborating reinforces
understanding of subject matter, making it easier to remember. Small-group
discussion can be especially beneficial -- ideally, each student will get
chances to participate. But regardless of group size, problem-based learning
promotes long-term knowledge retention by encouraging students to discuss --
and answer questions about -- new concepts as they’re learning them.
Development
of Transferable Skills, Problem-based learning can help students develop skills
they can transfer to real-world scenarios, according to a 2015 book that
outlines theories and characteristics of the pedagogy. The tangible contexts
and consequences presented in a problem-based learning activity “allow learning
to become more profound and durable.” As you present lessons through these
real-life scenarios, students should be able to apply learnings if they
eventually face similar issues.
Also, the following are disadvantages of problem based learning:
Potentially
Poorer Performance on Tests, Devoting too much time to problem-based learning
can cause issues when students take standardized tests, as they may not have
the breadth of knowledge needed to achieve high scores. Whereas problem-based
learners develop skills related to collaboration and justifying their
reasoning, many tests reward fact-based learning with multiple choice and short
answer questions. Despite offering many advantages, you could spot this problem
develop if you run problem-based learning activities too regularly.
Time-Consuming
Assessment, if you choose to give marks, assessing a student’s performance
throughout a problem-based learning exercise demands constant monitoring and
note-taking. You must take factors into account such as: Completed tasks, The
quality of those tasks, The group’s overall work and solution, Communication
among team members, Anything you outlined on the activity’s rubric, Monitoring
these criteria is required for each student, making it time-consuming to give
and justify a mark for everyone.
Finally,
all of the curriculum design have their advantages and disadvantages. The
question might be what is the best curriculum design to be used in our
education? The best curriculum design should have the following features: Every
aspect of the curriculum should have a clear objective or end goal to achieve.
A good curriculum is not rigid-it allows room for flexibility, monitoring and
evaluation by administration. It should provide sufficient scope for the
cultivation of unique skills, interest, attitudes and appreciations.
References:
Marsh,
C & Wills, G (1995). Curriculum;
Alternative Approaches, Ongoing Issues; Stoughton.
Posner,
G (2004). Analyzing the Curriculum.
New York. Mc Grow Hill Publishers.
William
E. Dull Jr (1993), New York; Post Modern
Perspective on Curriculum.
Njabili
A.F (1999); Public Examinations; A tool
for Curriculum Evaluation. Mture Educational Publishers.
Ralph
W. Tyler; Basic Principles of Curriculum
and Instructions.